A Florida state court judge has ordered a developer to restore a Miami waterfront condominium to a habitable state after it was gutted during a yearslong legal battle.
|
A Florida judge ordered that a developer must restore the Biscayne 21 condominium in Miami, FL, to a habitable state. |
"The outside windows are gone, there is no air -conditioning system for the building. ... I mean, everything's gone," says Waldman. "They have to pretty much rebuild the building. ... It's a skeleton."
Realtor.com reached out to attorney Susan
Raffanello, who represents Two Roads Development, for
comment.
Rebull's order comes three months after the Florida Supreme
Court declined to hear an appeal filed by the developer,
allowing a July 2025 ruling by the Third District Court of
Appeal that sided with Biscayne 21's owners opposing the
building's demolition to stand.
How the Biscayne 21 saga started
Built in 1964, the 13-floor, 192-unit Biscayne 21, located
at 2121 North Bayshore Drive, features tennis courts, a
pool, a barbecue area, parking, and most significantly, more
than 830 feet of water frontage overlooking Biscayne Bay,
the Port of Miami, and Miami Beach.
In 2022, Two Roads Development began purchasing units in the
building with the goal of dissolving the condominium,
demolishing the aging tower, and replacing it with a luxury
apartment complex.
However, despite being pressured by the developer and real
estate agents to sell, eight owners -- Angelica Avila,
Nicolas Bello, Maria Beatriz Gutierrez, Franah Vazir-Marino,
Robert Murphy, George Garcia, Lazaro and Jacqueline S. Fraga,
and Jeffrey and Shari Ulman—would not budge.
Waldman previously told Realtor.com that his clients were
reluctant to sell in part because the compensation Two Roads
was offering them was below what they would have needed to
buy comparable properties with waterfront views.
The developer's fatal stumbling block was that Biscayne 21's
condo rules, known as a declaration, required 100% of owners
to approve the condo's termination -- a threshold that could
not be met because of the dissenters.
According to a lawsuit filed by Waldman on behalf of the
holdouts in 2023, determined to go forward with the
redevelopment project, Two Roads took over the condo board
and illegally altered the language of the declaration,
lowering the termination requirement from unanimous consent
to 80% of owners.
A lower court initially sided with the developer, prompting
it to begin stripping the building in preparation for
demolition, even as Waldman filed an appeal with a higher
court, which ultimately found in his clients’ favor.
In a July 2025 opinion, the Third District Court of Appeal
ruled that the trial court "erred" in failing to recognize
that the developer violated the voting rights of unit owners
who refused to sell.
What's next for the fixer-upper condo?
Monday's court order does not set a deadline for Two Roads
to restore Biscayne 21 to its former livable condition, but
it does mandate that repair work on the building, which
currently has no windows or an air-conditioning system,
begin within 30 days.
Additionally, the developer must provide status updates on
the progress to the condo association and the court every 45
days.
"They have an obligation to get started right away, and
they're expected to do it," notes Waldman. "And we're going
to hold their feet to the fire every step of the way."
The plaintiffs' attorney adds that his clients are excited
about the prospect of regaining their homes after all these
years, and he is optimistic that, "one way or another," they
will be made whole.
"My clients never wanted to leave this building," says
Waldman. "They had every intention of living the rest of
their lives there. So when they were ceremoniously kicked
out with really no basis at law to do it, obviously, it was
terrible. It was decimating to them."
