Article
Courtesy of The Sun Sentinel
By Daniel
Vasquez
Published August 6, 2009
A
South Florida court last week threw its weight behind a new legal strategy
aimed at helping cash-strapped community associations fight back against
deadbeat investors.
It's called "blanket receivership" and the South Florida Court
of Appeals (Third District) ruled in favor of the strategy which allows a
local community association to file for receivership once to go after
multiple investors who rent out units but don't pay association fees.
Specifically, blanket receiverships are being used against investors who
own one or more units or homes, rent them out, collect the cash from
tenants but then fail to pay association fees and mortgages until they are
forced into foreclosure by the association.
The problem: By freeloading upon their own associations, these
deadbeat investors force the associations to pass on the financial burden
to those owners who do pay their assessments by asking them to pay even
more in special assessments. Too often the burden transforms paying owners
into delinquents or leads them into foreclosure, and the cycle continues,
leaving in its wake associations struggling to remain financially afloat
and cover water, garbage and electricity bills.
What's new: In May, this column noted that associations only had
one real recourse to file in court individual receivership requests per
owner, per unit; costing them thousands of dollars per case and loads of
time. Credit the South Florida-based Association Law Group for determining
that Florida statutes never intended to force associations to go after
such deadbeat investors one at a time.
"These statutes have been around for a long time, what's new is our
interpretation of them," said Ben Solomon, an attorney with ALG.
ALG laid out a legal plan for "blanket receiverships" in which
an association only has to pay court-related fees to file one jumbo case.
That in turn could provide a court-appointed receiver the power to siphon
rent money from one and all deadbeat investors in a particular complex,
regardless if they were delinquent before or after the court order, or
owned one or 100 units.
Since the firm began filing for blanket receiverships several months ago,
ALG has racked up about two-dozen association clients in Miami-Dade and
Broward counties; and more cases are in the works.
Court challenge: One delinquent investor from the Villages at
Dadeland Condominium Association in Miami recently fought back. The case
involved the owner of more than 15 rented units who did not pay a single
assessment in two years. His attorneys argued the association should have
filed separate receivership cases. But the judge allowed the blanket order
to stand.
"Now we have case law showing we are standing on solid ground with
this strategy," Solomon said.
Whom does this affect? Only investors who own units that are rented
out. These receivership programs do not involve owners who live in their
units or homes who fell behind in payments due to a sudden illness or job
loss.
Does this program harm associations or their financial operations? No. The
association itself does not fall into "receivership," so its
financial standing or creditworthiness is not diminished in any way. Nor
does the association lose any control of its books.
Daniel
can be reached at [email protected]
or at 954-356-4219 (Broward County) or 561-243-6686 (Palm Beach County).
His condo column runs every Wednesday in the Local section and online at www.sunsentinel.com/condos
. Check out Daniel's Condos & HOAs blog for news, information and tips
related to life in community associations at www.sunsentinel.com/condoblog
.
|