Posted : June 16, 2003
Diane Carr
Secretary
Department of Business and Professional
Regulations
Division of Land Sales and Condominiums
1940 North Monroe Street
Tallahassee, Florida 32399-1027
RE: Case No. 20021230CC30027
Dear Ms. Diane Carr:
What role does the DBPR serve in Condominium
Association criminal matters?
Your Division has completed numerous investigations
revealing over 26 individual counts of Florida Statute violations and investigators
have written numerous violation letters over the past year. Now where
do retired and financially challenged residents of Florida like myself
turn to for help after abusive association members leave them without money?
How can these sort of crimes go unpunished?
What is wrong with our system? I am writing to find out what department
handles a criminal investigation of a Condo
Association responsible of a repeated
large number of state statute violations. Board members from my association
have made over $300,000 disappear. All financial information for
the past seven (7) years has also disappeared, along with the invoices,
checks, and associated documentation.
From a report delivered to us last month,
the Association bank accounts reflected a negative value, the reserve funds
are at zero, meanwhile there are checks for over $70,000 issued out to
board members, their friends and their relatives. With Hurricane
season approaching and no money for reserves or to pay the insurance, families
of 282 units at Grand Vista Condo in Hialeah Gardens, FL may be left homeless.
Your Division has been aware of the violations
at our Association since July, 2001, as several unit owners have sent their
complaints. This has been the most obvious case of abuse of power
and blatant disregard of the Condominium Act, according to investigators
at your division. Investigators for the DBPR have requested to inspect
records, obtain copies of checks and annual financial reports but according
to what has been explained to me, there is nothing more that can be done.
This seems rather ridiculous that the DBPR requests the information and
is told by the Association that they lost it all and that's it! Nobody
gets in trouble! Nothing more gets done!
Well then WHO HAS THE PROPER JURISDICTION
TO INVESTIGATE THIS CRIME?
I have already been to the Mayor's office,
the city police, the county police, the State Attorneys office, the Insurance
Commissioner's office, and FDLE.
They have all passed the buck and failed
to take down a report for criminal investigation. Where do I go now?
Thank you for your assistance.
Eddie Hernandez
Hialeah Gardens, FL
This should give you some
idea of the extent of these violations.
In case number 20021230CC30027,
the Division documented that the Association is alleged to have:
1.) violated 718.115(1)(a), F.S. by using
funds for other than common expenses. Numerous checks were issued
to board members, their friends and relatives. The DBPR requested
copies but the Association has not complied with production of this information.
2.) violated 718.111(12)(a)11.a., F.S.
by failing to maintain financial records. The Association lost all
the records for the past seven years.
3.) violated 718.111(12)(a)12., F.S., by
failing to maintain documents for the 2002 election. They claim to
have obtained twice the number of votes than any previous year in the total
seven year history, yet upon request to show proof, the election documents
have mostly disappeared. The violation noted that in-eligible ballots
were counted but the Association could not demonstrate proof otherwise
and has refused to hold alternate elections.
4.) violated 718.111(12)(a)(6.), F.S.,
by failing to maintain the minutes of all meetings for the past seven years.
5.) violated 718.111(11)(a), F.S., by failing
to maintain proper insurance for all units.
6.) violated 718.111(11)(d), F.S., by failing
to maintain fidelity bonding insurance.
7.) violated 718.112(2)(e), F.S., failing
to adopt an annual budget for the past two years.
8.) violated 718.112(2)(f)2., F.S., failing
to include a reserve schedule. All reserve funds appear to have disappeared
without proper approval of the unit owners.
9.) violated 718.112(2)(f)2., F.S., failing
to properly fund reserves for emergency needs. The Association collected
the reserve funds but failed to properly fund the bank accounts.
10.) violated 718.112(2)(f)3., F.S., failing
to obtain unit owner approval prior to using the reserve funds for other
purposes. Over $300,000 is missing.
11.) violated 718.116(10)., F.S., by using
special assessment funds of $70,500 to pay for non-approved items.
12.) violated 718.111(12)(b)(c)., F.S.,
by failing to grant access to records within five days after receipt of
a written request.
13.) violated 718.111(13) by failing to
prepare a reviewed annual financial report for the past two years.
14.) violated 718.112(2)(e), F.S., by failing
to mail or deliver a notice of budget meeting and a proposed budget for
2003.
15.) violated 61B-22.003(1)(b), F.A.C.
by failing to disclose the period of the proposed budget for 2002.
16.) violated 61B-22.003(1)(c), F.A.C.
by failing to disclose the periodic assessments due from each unit for
the budget for 2002.
17.) violated 718.112(2)(a)2., F.S., by
failing to respond to unit owner
inquiry letters.
In case number 20030113CC30047,
the Association is alleged to have:
1.) violated 718.111(12)(b)., F.S., by
failing to maintain unit owner payment account records then later threatening
unit owners with collection and liens without providing proof that there
was any amount owed.
2.) violated 718.112(2)(a)2., F.S., by
failing to respond to unit owner inquiry letters sent in response to collection
threats and notices of liens.
In case number 20020920CC30944,
the Association is alleged to have:
1.) violated 61B-23.0021(8) F.A.C. by counting
ballots not cast in inner and outer envelopes.
2.) violated 61B-23.0021(10)(a) F.A.C.
by counting ineligible ballots.
3.) violated 61B-23.0021(10)(b) F.A.C.
by not having an impartial committee to verify the signatures and count
the ballot envelopes.
In case number 20020711CC30715,
the Association is alleged to have:
1.) violated 718.116(10) F.S. by failing
to mail or deliver to each unit owner notice of a special assessment meeting.
2.) violated 718.111(12)(c) F.S. by failing
to permit unit owners the opportunity to inspect the condominium records.
3.) violated 718.112(2)(d)1. F.S. by failing
to schedule the annual meeting and election which should have taken place
May 1, 2002 and did not take place until September 9, 2002. This
year they have failed to hold the election on time also. They hold
elections at whim or when prompted to do so by the DBPR.
CLICK
ON BANER TO READ THE WEBPAGES |
|