Background check's fee irks widower in condo fray

Article Courtesy of The Palm Beach Post

By Frank Cerabino

Published April 9, 2009  

To Norman Bartell, it's not the hundred bucks, it's the notion that he might be some sort of disreputable character.

Bartell, a retired dentist who has lived at Century Village in West Palm Beach for more than 20 years, is refusing to pay a $100 fee for a background check on himself.

"They're concerned about sex perverts," he said Tuesday. "I'm going on 87, so I don't think I should be considered a sex problem."

Cynthia Greenblat, the 80-year-old woman he lives with, laughed.

"It would be wonderful if he was," she said.

Greenblat and Bartell were living in separate condos at Century Village two years ago when they both lost their spouses within days of each other. The widow and widower became friends, and their friendship blossomed to the point where Bartell now just uses his Chatham M unit as a place to get mail.

He moved into Greenblat's Wellington H unit in October.

"He's my lover, my companion and all that stuff," Greenblat said.

But he's also subject to a Century Village bylaw that requires new residents to pay for a criminal and financial background investigation, which each building's board members get to evaluate.

'Treat everybody the same'

Bartell knows all about this. He used to be the president of his building and one of those people who got those reports.

It's useful, he said, for new people coming into Century Village for the first time, but it makes no sense for existing unit owners who move from one Century Village building to another.

"They could just call up and ask, 'How was this guy as a unit owner?' " he said.

Bartell's background check was prompted by another unit owner in Greenblat's building who had to pay the $100 background check in a similar cohabitation arrangement.

"I wouldn't have pursued it except that one of the other owners who had somebody move in with him asked, 'How come we're not investigating them?' " said Bruce Isaacs, the vice president of Greenblat's building. "You've got to treat everybody the same.

"We've had about 10 in our building who have moved from one building to another."

'Nobody has challenged it'

The investigations aren't shared between buildings and have to be done each time somebody moves within Century Village, Isaacs said.

"We had one gentleman who had to pay six times," he said. "Are we going to give everybody their money back?"

Bartell and Greenblat think it's time that somebody puts an end to this rule.

"Nobody has challenged it because they feel paying $100 is better than fussing with anybody," Bartell said. "But I'm willing to go all the way."

And so, it seems, is the condo organization, which sent them an attorney letter, foreshadowing a lawsuit.

Isaacs said the matter has created animosity in the building and will be expensive for Bartell and Greenblat whether they win or lose.

"It's going to cost them money. It's going to cost everybody in the building money," Isaacs said. "It's a shame.

CONDO ARTICLES HOME NEWS PAGE