Article Courtesy of The Palm
Beach Post
By Jennifer
Sorentrue
Published
January 27, 2013
WEST PALM BEACH — Palm
Beach County commissioners were evenly split Thursday on a controversial
plan to build on a closed golf course next to the Century Village
retirement community in suburban West Palm Beach, forcing the board to
delay its decision until next month when all of its members are present.
After five hours of debate, commissioners
voted 3-3 on a motion to deny the project outright.
Commissioners
Paulette Burdick, Hal Valeche and Jess Santamaria
voted to deny the development, which would which
transform the overgrown golf course near Haverhill
Road and Okeechobee Boulevard into an Abacoa-style,
mixed-use community. Commissioners Priscilla Taylor
and Mary Lou Berger, and County Mayor Steven Abrams
voted against rejecting it outright. Commissioner
Shelley Vana was not present for the vote.
Development
proposals that result in a tie vote are automatically
placed on the commission’s next zoning agenda to be
considered by the full board. The commission is slated
to discuss the item again on Feb. 28.
|
|
Century
Village residents sit in county commission chambers during a hearing
about development on a former golf course near their community.
|
Vana
had jury duty Thursday morning and missed the first two hours of the
meeting. She returned to the dais after the commission’s lunch break but
an attorney representing Century Village residents opposed to the project
objected to her voting because she had not been present to hear the
morning’s testimony. Commissioners are required to base zoning decisions
on information presented during a hearing.
Upon
the objection, Vana left. “We have to follow procedure,” she said on her
way out. She would not say how she planned to vote.
Developer
Andrew Waldman, who owns the golf course property, and Century Village
residents who spent hours waiting for the chance to comment said they were
frustrated by the tie. The commission has twice postponed a decision on the
project, which calls for 689 homes, townhomes, apartments, 84,500 square
feet of shops and offices, a civic center and a 100-bed, assisted-living
facility.
“It
is disappointing again,” Waldman said after Thursday’s meeting.
Century
Village resident Honey Sager, who helped lead opposition to the project,
also expressed disappointment. “It is extremely difficult for residents to
come here,” Sager said.
Three
busloads of residents flooded the governmental center to watch the meeting.
By 8:30 a.m., the auditorium reached its capacity of 125 people. An overflow
crowd sat in a viewing area just outside the meeting room. Another 25
watched from a viewing area on another floor.
More
than 70 people went before the commission to comment. Just over half spoke
against the development plan.
Many
in the crowd wore green T-shirts with the logo of Century Village’s
Proactive Residents Projects Committee, a non-profit group formed last year
to fight the development. Opponents pointed to a plat restriction placed on
the property in 1974 that they said required the land to stay a golf course
forever.
“I
cannot understand why they do not agree to uphold the deed restriction,”
Sager said after the meeting.
The
county attorney’s office has said that the commission can lift the zoning
restriction. County planners have recommended approval of the development.
Supporters,
including many Century Village residents, contend the project it would bring
economic development and raise property values. The 77 acres are just
outside an area the county has targeted for redevelopment.
“It
is time to put this project on ‘go’ and address some of the concerns of
the rest of us,” Century Village resident Jean Dowling told the
commission.
Commissioners
first considered the development in January 2012. But after five hours of
debate, that vote was tied. Santamaria, Burdick and former Commissioner
Karen Marcus voted to reject the project. Commission Priscilla Taylor did
not attend the January 2012 meeting and commissioners agreed to delay their
decision for nine months.
In
October the commission again delayed a decision, to give the landowner time
to meet with Century Village residents and revise the plan. But an agreement
was not reached.
This
week, supporters of the project criticized Santamaria, after learning the
commissioner allowed the opponents’ nonprofit group to hold a fundraiser
at his mall in Wellington. The nonprofit has opened a legal fund and plans
to sue the county if the development is approved and critics argued it was
inappropriate for Santamaria to help their cause.
Santamaria
has said that he has donated the use of his mall to nonprofits for years and
has made no secret of the fact he opposes the project.
After
learning about the fundraiser, County Mayor Steven Abrams asked county
attorneys Wednesday whether a commissioner could be forced to recuse himself
from a hearing if they have taken a public position on a project. The
answer: As long as a commissioner doesn’t stand to gain personally, he or
she can vote.
Abrams
did not specifically address Santamaria in his request. He said he sought
the opinion of the county attorney’s office in case someone raised the
question during the public hearing.
But
throughout Thursday’s hearing, Santamaria stressed that his decision was
based on testimony presented at the hearing.
Like
opponents, he pointed to the plat restriction. Santamaria said he feared a
decision to lift the requirement would set a precedent to lift similar
restrictions on environmentally sensitive land throughout the county.
“This issue goes way beyond Century Village,” he said.
But
Abrams argued the land would likely never return to a golf course.
“The
end result will not be that you will get the beautiful golf course that
existed,” Abrams said. “Here you have a responsible project. This
project is a traditional neighborhood development. It has a mixture of uses.
It is appropriate.”
|