A North Naples condominium association has sued homebuilder Lennar Homes, alleging construction defects that violate the Florida Building Code and other standards, resulting in roof and window leaks and other problems.
|
The LaMorada community in North Naples is the subject of multiple lawsuits filed against homebuilder Lennar Homes, alleging construction defects and violations of the Florida Building Code. |
Lee County records show Westhaven at Gateway Homeowners Association settled its 2022 lawsuit in July for an undisclosed amount after being forced into arbitration over similar issues involving 76 two-story coach homes.
Lennar also faces lawsuits in Alabama,
South Carolina, California and other states alleging water
intrusion, mold, structural issues and related defects. The
volume of litigation has prompted several Lennar-focused
Facebook groups where homeowners share experiences and
warnings.
“If you must buy a Lennar home, do yourself a favor and buy
from [an] existing owner who has dealt with the 100s of
fixes and the 2 years of headache with Lennar on getting it
right,” wrote Jim Walczak, who purchased a Lennar home in
Ave Maria in 2023.
Like many builders, Lennar requires homeowners to resolve
disputes through arbitration, which limits public access to
defect claims. Still, some associations pursue litigation,
making certain issues public. The master association lawsuit
was dismissed by a Collier Circuit judge, who ruled the
contract mandates private arbitration through the American
Arbitration Association. A status conference is scheduled
for January, with mediation set for April.
In the Seminole Tribe lawsuit, amended in August, a Broward
Circuit Court judge ruled last month that 343 homes owned by
the tribe could proceed in state court because those
contracts lacked arbitration agreements with the tribal
council. However, 123 homes purchased by individual tribe
members must go through private arbitration, as required by
their homeowner warranty agreements.
LaMorada’s issues
LaMorada was primarily built by WCI Communities between 2015
and 2021, with later phases constructed by Lennar after it
acquired WCI in 2017. The 200-acre, gated, resort-style
community east of Collier Boulevard at Immokalee Road and
Woodcrest Drive includes 343 homes — single-family
residences, villas and coach and carriage homes — along with
lakes, preserves and recreational amenities.
The latest lawsuit alleges the coach homes contain latent,
or hidden, defects not discoverable through reasonable
inspection but confirmed through expert testing. Such
defects can include roof or window leaks that emerge after
heavy rainfall.
“The work performed by Lennar’s various design professionals
and/or subcontractors in the Coach Homes I Community was
negligent, defective, and/or did not comply with the
approved plans and specifications, good building practices,
the Florida Building Code, and/or other applicable law,”
alleges the lawsuit filed by Orlando-based Becker &
Poliakoff, which also filed the other LaMorada cases.
“Lennar breached its duty by selecting design professionals
and/or subcontractors that were careless, incompetent,
and/or unfit to perform work in the Coach Homes I
Community.”
The lawsuit alleges deviations from approved plans,
specifications, good building practices and manufacturers’
installation instructions, asserting Lennar should have
known of these issues based on prior experience with the
same subcontractors. Similar allegations are made against
WCI.
Among the deficiencies cited by experts are water intrusion;
roof leaks; exposed roof underlayment; cracked and damaged
roof tiles; improper roof slopes, flashing and transitions;
window leaks; stucco staining, discoloration, mildew growth
and cracking; paint and texture failures; gutter issues;
plumbing and backflow-valve problems; and fire-alarm system
deficiencies.
Because WCI’s and Lennar’s design professionals and
subcontractors operated under agreements akin to employment
relationships, the lawsuit alleges the defendants are
vicariously liable for resulting damages.
Before turnover to the association, WCI-appointed board
members governed the community and owed fiduciary duties,
including maintaining buildings and common areas. The
lawsuit alleges those board members placed WCI’s interests
above the association’s, failed to maintain property and
breached duties of loyalty and care.
That conduct, the lawsuit alleges, constituted “a betrayal
of trust, an abuse of discretion, biased judgment, fraud,
self-dealing, unjust enrichment, bad faith, malfeasance,
misfeasance, misconduct, and/or unreasonable conduct.”
The lawsuit also alleges WCI and Lennar knew or should have
known that some subcontractors were insolvent or
inadequately insured, with policies excluding coverage for
construction defects.
WCI’s and Lennar’s attorneys did not respond to requests for
comment. Attorney Scott P. Kiernan, who represents the
association, declined to comment due to the pending
litigation.
Master association claims
The master association lawsuit cites alleged defects
involving concrete; stormwater management and drainage
systems; parking areas, roads and sidewalks; plumbing and
electrical systems; security gates; roofs; clubhouse
buildings; recreational facilities; HVAC systems; lighting;
and lake erosion.
It alleges WCI failed to comply with the Florida Building
Code and other regulations and breached declarations by
failing to fund reserves, improperly using resale
contributions and deferring expenses until after turnover.
Naples-based BUILD LLC filed a motion to dismiss, arguing
defects were not sufficiently specified. In September,
Circuit Judge Ramiro Maņalich granted dismissal motions by
Lennar and WCI, ruling homeowners’ contracts require
arbitration. Last month, he ordered the parties to complete
arbitration within 120 days.
Arbitration remains the standard path for most Lennar
homeowners. However, in Lennar Carolinas LLC v. Damico, the
South Carolina Supreme Court ruled in 2022 that Lennar’s
arbitration provisions were “unconscionable and
unenforceable” under state law due to their one-sided nature
and lack of meaningful negotiation.
