Citizens Insurance judges funded by insurer they
rule on, court records show
WPTV Investigative Reporter
Kate Hussey is digging into records that show the insurer is
funding the salaries of judges who decide policyholder disputes,
raising constitutional concerns about fairness |
|
Article Courtesy of Channel 5 WPTV
By Kate Hussey
Published November 24, 2025
|
WATCH VIDEO |
VERO BEACH — Florida homeowners
forced into arbitration with Citizens Insurance face judges whose
salaries are funded by the very company they're ruling against, court
records obtained by WPTV reveal.
|
In 2023, the state-run insurer added
mandatory arbitration clauses to policies, forcing
policyholders into a process where administrative law judges
— not juries — decide claim disputes.
A contract between Citizens and the state's Division of
Administrative Hearings (DOAH) shows the insurer funds these
judges' salaries at about $250,000 per year, set to increase
to $266,000 next year. The Florida Legislature approved the
agreement in House Bill 799.
"I don't think it's constitutional at all," said insurance
attorney Aaron Bass, who has no cases with Citizens but was
shocked to learn of the arrangement. "Judges take an oath to
uphold the law, to follow the law and to be impartial, but
judges are human. I don't see how they can divorce their
humanity from the fact that most of these administrative law
judges need to pay their mortgage, pay for groceries."
|
|
Records show the judges presiding over Citizens'
arbitration cases are funded by the insurer
|
According to a Citizens Board of Governors meeting,
more than 1,000 claim disputes had been sent to DOAH over the past two
years. About half of those, 517, were fully resolved.
Data from Citizens shows 37% of those cases ended in "favorable
settlements" for the policyholder. Just 11% went to a final hearing.
|
WPTV read through a full year of final
hearing cases from May 2024 to May 2025 and found that of
the 54 cases that weren't settled and went to a final
hearing — with both sides presenting evidence — judges sided
with Citizens in 53 out of 54 of them — 99%.
"You would think it would be 50-50, but it isn't," Bass
said. "It is almost an existentially disproportionate number
of losses for homeowners versus wins for homeowners. Just
absolutely crazy."
In one motion to vacate WPTV reviewed, a Pembroke Pines
couple who sustained damage from Hurricane Milton claimed
the administrative law judge presiding over their case
restricted their ability to present testimony and evidence,
depriving them of a full and fair hearing.
Additionally, an analysis by nonprofit ProPublica found DOAH
judges issued similar rulings in at least 20 other fact
finding phases of disputes.
Citizens is Florida’s state-run insurer — a last resort for
many homeowners who can’t find coverage elsewhere.
|
|
'What are we going to do,' Glorida and Jason Nitch
tell WPTV''s Kate Hussey
WATCH VIDEO
|
The company now holds the third-largest number of
policies in the state, down from its 2023 peak, when it held 15% of the
market and ranked number one.
Homeowners caught in limbo
Glorida and Jason Nitch of Vero Beach have been waiting more than a year
for a final decision on their insurance claim after an EF-3 tornado
damaged their home ahead of Hurricane Milton. Their roof has been
leaking ever since, with the ceiling separating and creating gaps along
the walls.
Citizens denied their claim in a May 15 letter, blaming "wear, tear, and
age-related deterioration." But a private engineer's report the couple
paid for found the tornado caused more than $65,000 in damage.
"We gotta fix this! Or it's going to crumble down around us and we're
not going to have anywhere to go," Glorida Nitch said.
The couple hired attorney Meredith Truen with HL Law Group, but their
case went straight to arbitration — a process they had no say in
choosing.
"I didn't know that until you told me," Glorida Nitch said, when
learning Citizens funds the judges. "I think it's extremely unfair."
"Did you have any idea this clause was in your policy?" reporter Kate
Hussey asked the couple.
"No, no!" they responded.
Constitutional challenges emerge
The arbitration process is now facing legal challenges. In August, a
circuit court judge issued a statewide injunction halting all Citizens
arbitrations, siding with a Hillsborough County lawsuit that argued
policyholders don't have a choice in the matter.
Attorney Joey Padilla, who is suing Citizens on behalf of his Delray
Beach clients, denied coverage for damage last October, said the process
strips away fundamental rights.
"I think they're stripping the Citizens insurance policy holders of
their rights," Padilla said. "They have a right to a trial by a jury,
and this is forcing their hand."
Nearly 400 Citizens cases are now on hold while courts question the
arbitration clause's constitutionality.
Citizens defends the process
Citizens defends its arbitration system, saying it saves time and money,
while cutting down on frivolous lawsuits. The insurer's data shows
arbitration costs average about $7,600 compared to more than $20,000 in
state court, with resolution times of 85 days versus 622 days in court.
A Citizens spokesperson said policyholders "impacted by the new
arbitration clause" were "notified of those changes before renewal" and
noted Florida law "prohibits any adverse employment action" based on a
judge's decision.
The insurer also noted that while one judge is questioning its
constitutionality, many other judges have previously ruled Citizens'
arbitration process is legal and should continue.
Citizens CEO Tim Cerio said in a press release that 90% of claims sent
to the Division of Administrative Hearings since 2024 were settled
voluntarily.
However, court documents suggest policyholders may feel pressured to
settle. In cases where homeowners lose, Citizens can demand
reimbursement of attorney fees and costs that could reach $10,000 to
$20,000, Bass said.
Of the cases that were resolved, Citizens data shows more than half of
policyholders settled with "nominal or no payment."
"Usually with Citizens, it's $500," Bass said. "We'll pay you $500, you
have 30 days to accept this. If you do not accept it in 30 days, and we
go to trial and we will prevail."
Waiting for resolution
For the Nitchs, the legal limbo means continued financial strain. Jason
is on disability with a fixed income, and they can't afford
out-of-pocket repairs.
"What are we going to do?" Glorida Nitch asked. "I'm on disability. I'm
on a very fixed income."
Their attorney, Truen, said the case is "stalled indefinitely."
"Unless they have lots of money stored away to go ahead and make those
repairs, they're in the waiting game," Truen said.
Citizens tells me their claims team is taking another look at the Nitchs'
case. But for now, the couple continues waiting as their home
deteriorates around them.
"We can't do it out of pocket," Glorida Nitch said. "And we can't win.
How are you supposed to win? We didn't know when we signed up."
|