Ingoglia seeks ‘transparency’ on property
insurance payments to affiliates
Chief financial officer
responds to insurance office analysis of more than $1 billion in
transfers. |
|
Article Courtesy of The Florida Phoenix
By Mitch Perry
Published October 12, 2026
|
|
TAMPA —
Florida Chief Financial Officer Blaise Ingoglia is calling for more
transparency when it comes to payments made between property insurers
and their affiliated companies.
His comment came Wednesday in a response to a story published jointly
last month by the Orlando Sentinel and South Florida Sun Sentinel about
an analysis commissioned by the Florida Office of Insurance Regulation (OIR)
in 2022.
|
The report revealed that between 2017 and
2019, insurers in Florida claimed $432 million in losses but
paid fees to their affiliate companies amounting to $1.3
billion.
The consultant who wrote the analysis also found that 20
insurers made affiliate payments exceeding the benchmark for
what was “fair and reasonable.”
“I think there should be more transparency in the way that
money flows back and forth between those affiliated
companies,” Ingoglia said Wednesday during a press
conference on the University of South Florida campus in
north Tampa.
“I know that there was a bill that passed through the House
years ago that did not pass through the Senate, but at the
time I was the Banking and Insurance chair and I was
championing that we put it up,” Ingoglia added. “I voted
affirmatively [and] I put it up as chairman because I think
that it is that important.”
Legislation has been sponsored for several years by
lawmakers to create a framework for oversight of affiliates
and their transactions with property insurers.
|
|
Florida CFO Blaise Ingoglia at the University of
South Florida (USF) in Tampa on Oct. 7, 2026.
|
A bill (HB 1399) in the Florida House during the 2026
legislative session by Pinellas Republican Rep. Kim Berfield would have
required insurers to weigh whether payments to affiliates are fair and
reasonable, and to provide factors for OIR to decide. It was approved
overwhelmingly in the Florida House, 106-3, but its Senate companion (SB
234) never received a hearing.
That proposal, sponsored by Sen. Carlos Guillermo Smith, D-Orlando,
capped payments to affiliates at 20%.
“Step one is to offer some transparency when it comes
to that,” Ingoglia said. “The other stuff we can debate. Until we have
the information and we know exactly what is going on, then everything
should follow after that.”
The newspapers reported that after they received an unredacted version
of the analysis this summer, attorneys for the Florida Senate threatened
both with “civil or criminal legal implications” if they refused to
immediately shred the evidence.
The editors with both publications insisted they had obtained the
records “legally and appropriately through the state’s public records
process” and would not allow the Senate’s “threats to prevent us from
reporting.”
The Tampa Bay Times initially reported about the secret analysis in
February 2025 following a two-year wait for public records. It led to
state lawmakers holding a single committee meeting in March 2025.
Political issue
Property insurance has emerged as a top issue in the Florida
gubernatorial race between Republican Byron Donalds and Democrat David
Jolly. Donalds has provided his own proposal but also contends the
Florida property insurance market has stabilized due to legislative
reforms passed earlier this decade — a talking point Gov. DeSantis and
other legislative Republicans have repeated.
Jolly told reporters late last month following the Sentinel-Sun Sentinel
story that the state’s insurance regulation system is “corrupt” and that
he would use executive action to cap amounts insurers can shift into
affiliated companies.
Homeowners’ insurance premiums increased by 75% between 2021 and 2025,
according to a May 2026 report by the Coalition for Insurable Future.
|