|
Article Courtesy of Florida Politics
By Jesse Scheckner
Published May 12, 2025
Members agreed the fifth proposal on the
panel’s agenda would be ‘a disaster’ if implemented.
Members of a new House Select Committee on Property Taxes
convened for their first meeting to discuss five proposals
Speaker Daniel Perez proffered as a “springboard” for talks
on delivering relief to Florida homeowners.
Some were more popular than others. One was summarily
rejected as “a really bad idea.”
The panel, led by Chairs Vicki Lopez and Toby Overdorf,
first went over the key concepts, definitions and structures
by which property taxes are administered in the state.
Overdorf, a Palm City Republican, said when it comes to
finding solutions that fit state and local demands,
“everything is on the table.”
He noted a sharp rise in property tax rates in recent years.
In 2015, collections by counties, municipalities, school
districts and certain independent special districts were
about $28.3 billion.
By 2020, however, they had increased to $37.7 billion. Since
then, they grew by another $17.5 billion.
“Collections do not have to increase just because property
values have skyrocketed,” he said, conceding that property
values had risen sharply. “This is a choice by the taxing
authorities when they set their millage rates.”
The Florida Constitution prohibits a state property tax but
authorizes counties, municipalities, school districts and
certain independent special districts to levy them.
Accordingly, any change to that model and the ability of
local governments to levy property taxes requires a
constitutional amendment by statewide referendum or a
county-level vote on the matter.
The five proposals take that into consideration to varying
effects.
Several of the committee’s members agreed that regardless of
which, if any, of the proposals lawmakers pursue when the
Legislature reconvenes for Session next year, it is vital
that localities be included in the conversation.
Republican Rep. Richard Gentry of Astor said lawmakers
should be cautious in shifting the burden to sales taxes as
it would make Florida noncompetitive with other states. It
could also upset the fiscal equilibrium of smaller, more
financially constrained counties as the state redistributes
the funds.
“I would hate to have to try and outvote Dade, Broward and
Palm Beach,” he said. “Just the conversation about sales
taxes raises the hair on the back of my neck.”
Astor Republican Rep. Richard Gentry and others urged the
committee’s members to be mindful of the unintended impacts
on smaller counties and cities. Image via Florida
Politics/Colin Hackley.
Belleview Republican Rep. Ryan Chamberlin, who last year
sponsored legislation to abolish property taxes in Florida
and replace them with a new “consumption tax,” said tackling
the issue of property tax reform is so difficult because its
central concept is unjust.
“We’re trying to tweak and adjust an unfair tax. … We’re
taxing people on unrealized gains instead of taxing on real
transactions and not bureaucratic opinion,” he said. “And
when you’re taxing on bureaucratic opinions, you’ve got all
these moving parts that you’re trying to make feel right,
but it just never ends up feeling right.”
The committee discussed the five proposals below. Included
are key comments about each. Lopez, a Miami Republican,
reminded members the proposals are “just starting points.”
“We will be considering,” she said, “any and all suggestions
(and) recommendations that we hear (from) of our
constituents and stakeholders across the state.”
Proposal 1: Require every city, county and special district
to hold a referendum at the next General Election on the
question of eliminating property on homestead properties
This proposal, perhaps because it came first, drew the
longest discussion Friday. Some, like Tampa Democratic Rep.
Dianne Hart, expressed worry about how local governments
would be able to pay for services without property taxes.
Parkland Democratic Rep. Christine Hunschofsky said she is
concerned that many residents don’t understand what their
property taxes pay for and recommended that consideration be
given to better educating them before any decision is made.
“We realized in the last election there may have been issues
with how people were talking about issues that were on the
ballot,” she said, referring to confusion around six
proposed constitutional amendments voters weighed in on in
2024.
Port Orange Republican Rep. Chase Tramont said non-homestead
properties shouldn’t be left out of the equation.
“People often say renters don’t pay property taxes. That’s
not true,” he said. “They are being passed down to them.”
Proposal 2: Create a new $500K homestead exemption for all
non-school taxes and increase the exemption to $1M for
residents who are 65 or older or who have had a homestead
exemption for 30 years or more
Orlando Democratic Rep. Anna Eskamani described this
proposal as “very thoughtful,” considering how many longtime
residents living on fixed incomes are having an increasingly
harder time making ends meet as property values skyrocket.
In Miami-Dade County, for instance, she said there are few
properties valued below $500,000, and Florida’s current
homestead exemptions aren’t helping homeowners much.
“Creating this new exemption … and then for our elderly
people, who are the ones that are in most need and are being
displaced from their homes they’ve lived in for decades at a
time,” she said, “would provide some real relief.”
Rep. Shane Abbott, a DeFuniak Springs Republican, said it’s
the opposite problem in his district, where some counties
may not have more than a couple houses each worth $500,000
or more.
He recommended that if the state moves forward with the
proposal that there should be “some type of state offset” to
compensate for the shortfall it would create.
“And you’re talking about wiping out the entire tax base,”
he said. “This one scares me a lot, actually.”
Tallahassee Democratic Rep. Gallop Franklin suggested a
formula be used rather than a flat number. Islamorada
Republican Rep. Jim Mooney agreed, noting that the median
price of a home in Monroe County is more than $900,000.
“Throwing a blanket across the state of Florida is simply
not going to work,” he said.
Davie Democratic Rep. Mike Gottleib warned that giving such
an “aggressive tax break” could “trap people in their
homes.” Instead, he said, the state should work more on
affordability or finding ways to help elderly people move
into smaller, more affordable homes.
Proposal 3: Authorize the Legislature to raise the homestead
exemption up to any value by statute
Republican Rep. Dean Black of Jacksonville praised this
option because it would enable lawmakers to act as needed on
property taxes, including eliminating them altogether —
something to which the two prior proposals don’t fully
speak.
“One of the impetuses for us actually having this committee
is in recognition of the fact that ad valorem taxes are
inherently unfair. You work your whole life to create a
home, but you never, ever truly own it,” he said. “This
option provides us the freedom and the flexibility to make
sure that we do enough to ensure that people are forever
free of taxes on property that they’ve bought, that they’ve
worked for and they’ve paid for.”
Eskamani said any implementation of the proposal should come
with additional ways for localities to generate revenue,
since the Legislature would likely have difficulty
increasing taxes again if there are fiscal issues.
“If this body were to, for example, reduce the tax liability
and expand the exemption, we’re never going to bring it back
up,” she said. “Politically speaking, voting to reduce an
exemption — i.e., tax more people — is so politically
difficult to do and also requires a two-thirds majority in
the legislative body, based on the state constitution. I
would worry about tying hands in a way that you’re never
going to be able to change.”
Proposal 4: Change the existing homestead exemption cap from
3% a year to 3% every 3 years and reduce the non-homestead
level from 10% annually to 15% every 3 years for non-school
taxes
Black said this was his least favorite option because it
wouldn’t accomplish what he believes should be the prime
objective of this effort: eliminating unfair property taxes.
Lakewood Ranch Republican Rep. Bill Conerly said the
proposal would shift the tax burden to non-homestead
properties, which brings problems.
“In my experience, every industry in Florida is
labor-constrained, and one of the main constraints is
associated with housing,” he said. “This, I think, would
have an extremely negative impact on rental property. … It’s
going to increase the cost … and it will have a significant
impact on those who have not yet been able to secure a
permanent home.”
Placida Republican Rep. Danny Nix, a commercial Realtor,
warned that increasing non-homestead taxes could hurt the
rental market.
Proposal 5: Eliminate the ability to foreclose on a
homestead property due to a property tax lien
Everyone hated this idea, and each comment criticizing its
logic and merit solicited laughter.
“No disrespect to whoever came up with this one,” Abbott
said. “Nobody will pay their property taxes, ever. I mean, I
might not at this point.”
Rep. Michael Owen, an Apollo Beach Republican, called the
proposal “a disaster.”
“What are you going to tell a bank?” he said. “What would
this do to a title insurance policy? Any time you go to
close, every lien has to be removed from a property. What
you’re doing is you’re actually encouraging a default on the
best investment you can make, usually, in your life. This is
a really bad idea.”
Hart concurred, describing the proposal as “just awful.”
“Because nobody would pay, and if they don’t pay and if they
want to sell their house, it wouldn’t be of any value
because they’ve given it all away in liens,” she said. “So
yeah, I think we should take this one off the board.”
Overdorf said Perez expects the committee to develop one or
more joint resolutions before committees begin meeting ahead
of the 2026 Session, which will likely require the panel’s
37 members meet again as inter-chamber negotiations on the
state’s next budget recommence.
|