Article Courtesy of The Miami Herald

By Alexandra Glorioso

Published  March 28, 2025

Florida lawmakers pushing for adjustments to condo safety laws have hit an early impasse over two proposals: one that would allow condo associations to invest funds that have been saved for future building repairs, and another barring associations that shirk the law from getting insurance under the state-run Citizens program.

Lawmakers sponsoring the House and Senate proposals are trying to bring condominium associations into compliance with laws they crafted after a 12-story residential tower in Surfside collapsed in 2021, killing 98.

Those laws mandate Florida condominium associations get building inspections that are triggering immediate repair costs, and that they also save for future building maintenance.

The state hasn’t offered assistance with either new financial burden, even as unit owners who can’t afford the extra expenses are facing foreclosure. Sen. Jennifer Bradley is proposing in her bill, SB 1742, that associations be allowed to make investments with the money they save for future building repairs to help offset the cost to condo owners.

“We’re going to have a lot of dollars in reserves, and these associations should be able to leverage those dollars,” said Bradley, a Fleming Island Republican. The Senate Committee on Regulated Industries, of which she is chairwoman, approved her proposal on Tuesday.

The bill still has two more Senate committees to get through before it is taken up by the entire chamber.

“It puts up guardrails. We invest our state employees’ retirement, and it’s a similar structure,” Bradley said. “And the earnings on those investments will go towards capital repairs, capital improvements first.”

But Rep. Vicki Lopez, a Miami Republican, told the Herald/Times on Tuesday that she worries the provision will create “lots of fraud.”

“I worry. I worry every day because not all association board members are sophisticated,” Lopez said, adding that many condominium associations in her district are “run by elderly people.” “I’m worried that someone may take advantage of them. … What happens to those funds if they’re not invested properly and they lose their shirts? So I don’t think it’s a good idea.”

Lopez is proposing a different change to the status quo in a bill she’s sponsoring, HB 913, which Bradley doesn’t support.

Lopez’s bill would prohibit condominium associations that aren’t complying with the post-Surfside laws from obtaining insurance through the state-run Citizens Property Insurance Corporation. Currently, there are no criminal penalties for associations, for instance, that shirk the requirement to get a “structural integrity reserve study,” which outlines costs associated with saving for future repairs.

But associations that don’t complete the study will be hard pressed to get loans or insurance on the private market, experts have said. Lopez wants to provide the same tough incentive with state-run insurance.

“It is the stick,” Lopez said earlier this month about the provision.

Lopez’s bill will face one more committee in the House before it is taken up by the entire chamber.

Bradley previously spoke out against the Citizens component of Lopez’s bill on social media, saying the condo insurance market “is held together by duct tape.”
“Denying access to Citizens makes the situation worse,” Bradley wrote on Feb. 24.

Bradley said on Tuesday that she was still against the concept.

“I would never say anything is a no-go in negotiations … but that’s not something I think I’d want to embrace,” Bradley said.