FLYING "OLD GLORY" ? |
By LINDA MCNATT Posted December 12, 2002
"They feel attacked,'' she said. "They think we're calling them unpatriotic. They say -- rules are rules. We have to take the flagpole down.'' It's not the flag, it's the pole, board president John Countryman Sr. said. Homeowners are allowed up to one decorative flag per lot, he said, provided the pole is mounted on the front of the house. No free-standing flag poles are allowed. "Our board is definitely not against the American flag,'' he said. "Four of the six board members are either military or retired military. I'm retired from the Air Force.'' But it is about the flag, Parrott said. It's about being allowed to display the American flag prominently and properly. No other flag demands the dignity of a pole, she said. "I'm really feeling like it's not my community,'' said Stephany Pike, who will join Parrott's petition drive. "It's their community. I'm very disappointed in the board.'' Tracy Ralphs, Parrott's Leyton Place neighbor, said he objected to the board's "arrogance'' about the issue. "They are doggedly sticking to their guns on this,'' he said. Parrott said she'll take her flagpole down until the issue is resolved. She hopes to collect at least 200 signatures in the petition drive. The board has promised a "timely'' decision. The Ohio native could be assessed a fine of $10 a day since mid-November, when she was first notified that her flagpole violated community rules. She expects to hear the board's decision about that in seven days, she said. Parrott is bent on changing the rules. "We are a military community, and this country is currently involved in a war on terrorism,'' she said. "We're in a more patriotic mode today than we were 10 years ago, when these rules were written.'' |